CH8 | LEVEL CROSSINGS
Signalling
CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
LEVEL CROSSING
MODERNISATION
3.
AVAILABLE TTYPES OF
LEVEL
CROSSING
4.
MANUALLY CONTROLLED
CROSSINGS
5.
AUTOMATIC
CROSSINGS
6.
OPEN
CROSSINGS
7.
OTHER
VARIATIONS
8.
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN
LEVEL
CROSSINGS
9.
SINGAPORE LEVEL
CROSSING FOR FIRE VEHICLE/MAINTAINER
ACCESS
10.
LEVELCROSSING
PREDICTORS
1.
INTRODUCTION
One
of the early problems encountered by
railway engineers was that of
crossing existing roads. The
operators and the engineers
are very fortunate
if all crossings
can be achieved by
the construction of bridges. The
level crossing was however
a cheap and effective
means of dealing with the
problem: With the increases in speed
and volume of both road and rail
traffic, level crossings may cause
greater operational problems.
However, geographical and cost
factors may require many level
crossings to be retained.
Level
crossings have the following
disadvantages:-
a)
They often require additional
staff to operate.
b)
They can reduce line capacity
and increase the risk of delays to
rail traffic.
c)
They are an additional safety
risk.
d) They may be
unpopular with road users.
When
railways were first built. the type
of level crossing protection
provided varied according to the
terrain, the type of train service
and the density of population.
Political considerations were also
significant.
In countries like
the United Kingdom where centres of
population were already
established and most land was
privately owned, there was generally
an obligation on the railway
companies to fence off the railway.
In Australia, no such obligation
exists. Many lines in sparsely
populated areas will not be
fenced.
Early level crossings in
the UK therefore consisted of gates
which could be placed across the
road or the railway to protect one
from the other. Many early level
crossings in Australia were totally
unprotected. There was not the need
or the available finance to provide
anything more.
Looking at the UK
example, therefore, most level
crossings required an operator or
attendant to operate gates across
the full width of the roads.Nowa
days , most gates have been replaced
by lifting barriers.
This section
will deal with the basic
requirements of level crossing
protection and ways in which level
crossings can be made more economic
and efficient in operation. Because
most countries have extensive
regulations to deal with the control
of road traffic,
details of
crossing layout and
construction and the operation of
specific types of equipment are not
covered in these notes. The general
principles of operation of the main
types of modem level crossing
from the railway
operating viewpoint
will be dealt with.
2. LEVEL
CROSSING
MODERNISATION
On most
railways, the signal engineer is
responsible for providing any level
crossing protection other than the
provision of basic warning signs.
There will normally be pressures on
the signal engineer to improve the
level of protection and/or reduce
operating costs. Any equipment
provided must, of course, be safe
and reliable.
Operation of level
crossings can be very expensive. In
recent years British Rail bas been
engaged in an extensive programme of
level crossing modernisation. The
main factors to justify such a
programme are given
below.
2.1
Staff Savings
This
is probably the main reason for
modernisation.
Where local
conditions require the road to be
closed across its whole width, some
form of human supervision is
essential to check that the crossing
is completely clear before
permitting trains to pass. Instead
of providing a local attendant,
closed circuit television will
permit a signalman or crossing
attendant to supervise one or more
remote level crossings, often in
addition to one adjacent to the
crossing/signal
box.
Alternatively, it may be
possible to automate the operation
of the level crossing. Some form of
local or remote monitoring for
correct operation is still
required.
The level of monitoring
for correct operation will depend on
local circumstances. In the UK,
levels of road and rail traffic
require continuous monitoring. Any
failures could have a serious impact
on the safety and flow of traffic.
The Australian approach is to
perform a daily inspection or test.
In remote areas, the person
performing this test may not
necessarily be a railway employee.
The availability and cost of
available persons could lead to some
form of remote monitoring being
considered in the
future.
2.2
Improvements in Line
Capacity
Manually
controlled crossings, whether
gates or barriers,
are interlocked
with the signals.
If the driver of an approaching
train is not to see a restrictive
aspect, the crossing must be closed
and the signals cleared some time
before the arrival of the
train. It may
not be possible to open
the road to traffic between closely
following trains. This may cause
severe delays to road traffic.
Conversely, leaving the road open
for sufficient time
to clear a
backlog of road traffic may
delay an approaching
train.
Assuming that the options
to close the road or to build a
bridge have been discounted, the
only solution is to reduce the road
closure time. This can be done by
removing the interlocking with
signals and operating crossings
automatically. The crossing is then
only closed for a short period
before the arrival of each train
until it bas completely cleared the
crossing. To ensure safety, road
traffic must not be obstructed on
the exit side of the
crossing.
2.3
Improvements in
Safety
The use of
barriers is inherently much safer
than gates, partiatlarly if used in
conjunction with road
signals.
Opinions differ on the
effect of automatic crossings on
safety. The reduction in road
closure time obviously reduces
traffic congestion and gives road
users less cause
to disobey the
road signals (regular users
will know that the road
will only be closed
for a short
period). As there are never
barriers on the exit side of the
crossing, road vehicles and
pedestrians cannot get trapped
on the crossing.
However, the
removal of interlocking
with signals may also remove
the opportunity to stop
a train in sufficient time if the
crossing becomes obstructed.
In
all cases road users
must be
disciplined to obey
the signs and
signals on the
approach to the crossing.
Pedestrians may be very diffiatlt to
control where there are
no barriers or
half barriers.
The problems will
often vary according to the culture
of the country. In the
UK, level crossing
automation has often been perceived
by the public as a reduction in
protection because the local
attendant' is no longer visibly in
charge of all traffic. In addition
road users do not appear to
pay the same regard to road traffic
signals as railway personnel do to
their signals. In countries having a
large number of unprotected open
crossings, any form of protection is
seen as an improvement.
In the UK
a large quantity of
statistical information
has now been built
up which appears to
indicate that automatic half barrier
crossings are in fact very safe (as
compared with other types)
regardless of the volume of road
traffic. Automatic open
crossings, to
achieve a similar level
of safety, must be restricted to
situations with lower road traffic
density and/or speed.
These
findings may not always be
applicable to other countries. As an
example, one of the problems of open
and automatic crossings in the
United States is that of trying to
beat the train to the crossing,
regardless of any road signals which
may be displayed. This is probably
because a long, slow moving train
may block the crossing for several
minutes (a train 2km long running at
15km/h would block a crossing for
over 8 minutes!).
The provision
of barriers may also vary.
Australian practice is to provide
half barriers where the road crosses
two or more tracks, as a physical
reminder to the road user when two
trains approach the crossing at the
same time. On a single track
railway, where this problem does not
arise, barriers are not normally
provided.
In most cases the
public perception of level crossings
will influence the
amount of government
regulation. As a minimum, there are
usually certain standard road
traffic signs which need to be
erected. In the UK,
government regulation
extends to the
determination of the type and layout
of each level crossing on an
individual basis. Any
alterations to operation
or appearance also have to be
approved.
3.
AVAILABLE TYPES OF LEVEL
CROSSING
Modem level
crossings can be broadly divided
into the following
categories:-
a)
Manually worked, normally with
full or half barriers according to
local requirements and/or
legislation.
With
local attendant
Remotely
supervised (closed circuit
television - CCTV) User
worked
Operated by train
crew
b) Automatic
(half barriers or open - no
barriers).
Remotely monitored
(from adjacent signal box)
continuously
Locally monitored
(by driver) with the passage of each
train
No continuous monitoring
but regularly tested and inspected.
In the UK, this
type of crossing would not be
permitted. The period before a
failure would become apparent is
considered unacceptable.
c)
Open - no road or rail
signals - suitable warning notices
only.
While some types may be
used regardless of traffic density
or speed, others have slight or
severe practical restrictions on
their use. The following
descriptions are based on UK
practice.
4.
MANUALLY CONTROLLED
CROSSINGS
The most
common type is the Manually
Controlled Barrier (MCB) which may
be either locally controlled
or remotely supervised using CCTV.
The crossing is directly
interlocked with all signal
routes over the crossing. The
signalling layout for a
typical MCB installation
is shown on Figure 1
The
main features of the MCB crossing
are as follows:-
Barriers across
the full width of the road.2 or 4
barriers may be provided dependent
on the width of the road. Lowering
of the barriers will be preceded by
operation of road
traffic signals.
On lines
with overhead electrification, the
barrier arms will normally be
earthed.
An audible warning will
be provided for pedestrians from the
start of the operating sequence
until the barriers are fully
lowered.
Figure 1 MANUALLY
CONTROLLED BARRIER (MCB) LEVEL
CROSSING
Although not
desirable, overlaps may extend over
the crossing without requiring the
barriers lowered provided the signal
is at least 50m (25m if a platform
starter) from the edge of the
crossing.
Routes may be set while
the barriers are raised. Signals
will not clear until the barriers
are fully lowered and the crossing
is clear. The signalman/attendant
must operate a special "crossing
clear" button for this
purpose.
The signalman/attendant
will have an indication of road
signals operating and
barriers lowered on his
control panel (or
equivalent).
Signals will clear
for one movement only.
Under
appropriate conditions, facility may
be provided to lower the barriers
automatically. In most cases, an
automatic raise facility is provided
which operates as soon as the train
bas cleared the crossing and the
signal approach locking is released
(provided no other routes have been
set).
Crossings supervised by
CCTV are provided with a Local
Control Unit (LCU)
which permits local operation
in the event of CCTV failure
or maintenance or
for other engineering
work. When the LCU is in use the
signals are maintained at
danger.
In general, a signal
passed at danger will immediately
operate the road traffic
signals.
Safety of MCB crossings
is ensured by: Interlocking
with signals.
Detecting the
barriers down and the road signals
operating. Provision of a separate
"crossing clear"
button.
Maintaining the barriers
down until the approach locking on
all protecting signals is released
and the crossing is clear of
trains.
The MCB is generally the
most expensive type of
crossing to provide.
In the UK there
were no restrictions on its
use.
5.
AUTOMATIC
CROSSINGS
Automatic
crossings will generally have no
barriers or half barriers. This is
to ensure that vehicles and
pedestrians do not become trapped on
the crossing. They will
always be provided with
road traffic signals. In
general, the operating
sequence will be timed
so that at least 27 seconds
(UK practice, determined by
government regulation)
elapses from the
start until the arrival of the
fastest train. This timing is
calculated from
the operating sequence
of the particular type of road
traffic signals in use, the
lowering time of
the barriers (if any)
and a suitable margin of time before
the train reaches the crossing. It
could therefore vary for other types
of road signal and/or barrier
equipment. The crossing
will reopen to road traffic
provided:-
a) The
train is clear of the
crossing.
b) The
crossing can remain fully open to
road traffic for at least 10 seconds
after the passage of the
train.
Therefore, if another
train is approaching the crossing
within this period, the crossing
will remain closed to road traffic
until both trains have
passed.
Automatic crossings may
be monitored by an
adjacent signal box
(remotely monitored) of
by the driver (locally monitored).
At locally monitored crossings a
flashing white light indicates
to the driver that the road signals
are operating.
Provision is
generally made for local control, to
cover periods of maintenance,
failures or track maintenance in the
vicinity of the controlling
track circuits. Local control
may also be necessary in the event
of planned or unplanned single line
working on a double track railway.
It may, however be cost effective to
equip crossings for bi-directional
working on all lines. The provision
of the additional circuitry could
well be more economic than the cost
of providing crossing attendants for
single line
working.
5.1
Automatic Half Barrier Level
Crossing
(AHB)
The
automatic half barrier crossing
is the earliest and
most widespread
automatic crossing in
the UK. Each barrier is pivoted on
the left hand side (for
left hand road
traffic) and covers
slightly less than half the width of
the road. It is monitored from
an adjacent signal
box.
A dedicated telephone
circuit and indications for barriers
and power supply are
provided.
Operation can be
initiated by track circuits,
treadles (or a combination of
both). The running on or
"strike-in" end of the track circuit
may be provided with a
welded stainless steel
strip on the rail surface to
protect against bad contact due to
rust
The simplest arrangement for
the AHB crossing is on a single
line. On most
single lines there is no
possibility of a second train
striking in before the crossing has
been open for 10 seconds. Therefore,
the operation of the crossing
is initiated by a
track circuit
approaching the crossing from
either side becoming occupied. The
crossing will remain closed to
road traffic until the train
has cleared the crossing. A treadle
may be provided at the crossing to
safeguard against false operation of
the track circuit by
proving that the
front of the train has
reached the crossing.
The
controls are more complicated in the
case of a double line. In the
example on Figure 2, the crossing
operation is initiated by timed
occupation of the approach track
circuit. Occupation of the other
approach track circuit while the
crossing is closed to the road will
maintain the crossing closed until
both trains have passed.
The
example also shows the provision of
emergency replacement on the
automatic signal approaching the
crossing. There must be a minimum of
50 metres and a maximum of 10
minutes between a stop signal and
the crossing. The signal
must either be
a controlled signal or
an automatic signal with an
emergency replacement
facility.
In the opposite
direction, a station is located next
to the crossing. Special
arrangements are necessary if the
road is not to be closed for an
excessive length of time by a
stopping train. The
signalman may select between an
operating sequence for a stopping or
a non stopping train. For a
non-stopping train the platform
starting signal
clears immediately
and the normal sequence
of operation will apply.
For a stopping train,
the signal will be maintained
at danger for a suitable time (to
allow for the station stop).
Crossing operation
will commence before the
signal clears. The signal will clear
so as to permit the minimum road
closure time before arrival of a
train starting from the
platform.
There is no restriction
on the volume of road or rail
traffic. The speed of rail traffic
must be below 100 mph (160km/h). To
limit the time for a road vehicle to
cross, a maximum of 2 running lines
and 2 other lines are permitted. If
any of these conditions cannot be
fulfilled or the crossing and
approaching road layouts are
unsuitable, the MCB type of crossing
must be used.
Figure 2 AUTOMATIC
HALF BARRIER (AHB) LEVEL
CROSSING
If
signals are located within the
"strike-in" distance of the level
crossing, the controls can become
very complicated. The crossing
operation must not commence
unless a route
has been set (or an automatic
signal can show a
proceed aspect)
over the crossing.
The clearance of such a signal
may need to be delayed to
ensure adequate crossing
closure time. If a train
passes a signal at danger, crossing
operation should commence
immediately. If a signal
is replaced to danger·after
showing a proceed aspect and the
train is successfully
brought to a stand at the signal,
the crossing may be opened after the
approach locking bas
been released.
5.2
Automatic Open Crossing
Remotely Monitored (AOCR)
This
type of crossing is effectively an
AHB without barriers. Due to the
absence of barriers, its use is
restricted to situations where the
road traffic is very light. The
crossing is also restricted to a
maximum of 2 lines and a line speed
of 75 mph (120km/b).
Additional
safeguards due to the absence of
barriers are:-
a) An
illuminated "Another Train Coming"
sign which operates
as the first train
reaches the crossing when two
trains are to pass over the crossing
before it reopens
to road traffic. This is
to ensure that road users do not
assume it is safe to
proceed (or fail to
check the main road signals) after
the passage of the first
train.
b) In
conjunction with the operation of
the "Another Train Coming" sign, the
audible warning will change in
pitch.
5.3
Automatic Open Crossing
Locally Monitored
(AOCL)
Instead of
providing indication and telephone
circuits to a remote monitoring
point, many crossings can more
economically and effectively be
monitored by the
driver as be
approaches the crossing. One
vital provision is
that be must be able
to stop the train
short of the crossing in the
event of any failure of the crossing
equipment or obstruction of the
crossing.
A flashing white light
facing in each direction of rail
traffic is provided at the crossing
which operates when the road signals
are operating correctly. The speed
of approaching trains must be
restricted so that the driver can
stop short of the crossing if the
white light fails to operate (or if
the crossing is obstructed). Warning
boards are provided on the approach
to the crossing. An overall maximum
speed limit of 55 mph
(88km/b) or lower is applied to
ensure adequate sighting.
If
there is a station on the approach
side of the level crossing where
trains normally stop then ALL trains
must stop to ensure correct
operation of the crossing. This is
normally enforced by a stop board
although a signal could be employed
instead. It is thought that
the
provision of a
Main signal and a
flashing white light
signal in the same
place could cause confusion.
Some crossings therefore exist where
the proceed aspect of the signal
performs the function of the white
light. All trains will initially be
brought to a stand by
the signal at danger.
There is
some restriction on the volume of
road traffic for which an AOCL is
suitable. This is not as severe as
for an AOCR.
Figure 3 AUTOMATIC
OPEN CROSSING ,LOCALLY MONITORED
(AOCL)
If the train does
not reach the crossing within a
reasonable time the crossing
will reset to open the
road. This is quite safe because the
driver's white light will already
have been extinguished and the
driver will therefore be prepared to
stop (if a train is actually on
the track circuit it will
obviously be travelling very
slowly). This is a useful safeguard
against track circuit failure
causing serious road traffic
delays.
5.4
Automatic Barrier Crossing
Locally Monitored
(ABC-L)
This is a new
addition to the available types of
level crossing. It has the
operational advantages of the AOCL
but is also provided with half
barriers. It is therefore suitable
for situations with heavier road
traffic.
Operation is the same as
for the AHB. The flashing white
light operates when the road signals
are operating and the barriers have
commenced to lower. Proving the
barriers down would effectively
reduce the train speed over the
crossing (due to the longer
operating time and the effective
upper limit on sighting) or increase
crossing closure time.
Automatic
reset facilities are provided
similar to the AOCL
6.
OPEN
CROSSINGS
On some lines
it may be acceptable for all trains
to severely reduce
speed at a
level crossing. If both road
and rail traffic are low, the
provision of an Open
Crossing (without road
signals) may be adequate.
Suitable road signs are
provided on the road
approaches and a warning board
at braking distance on the rail
approaches. A speed restriction
of 10 mph (16 km/h) applies to
all trains.
Road traffic is
instructed to give priority to rail
traffic. Train drivers
must ensure the
crossing is clear of obstruction
before proceeding.
This type of
crossing is suitable for single
lines only. There are no signals
therefore no warning can be given of
the approach of a second
train.
7.
OTHER
VARIATIONS
On crossings
where either the road or rail
traffic is very infrequent, other
alternatives may be used.
If the
railway crosses a private road with
generally a small number of regular
users and protection is considered
necessary due to the frequency of
rail traffic or the approach view of
rail traffic, the crossing may be a
barrier or gate crossing operated by
the user. Telephone communication
and/or warning signals to indicate
an approaching train would normally
be provided. The gates or barriers
would normally be left closed across
the road.
If it is acceptable for
the trains to stop, the crossing may
be operated by the train crew. At
least one other person in addition
to the driver is desirable - the
train will have to stop, set down
the crossing operator, who then
closes the crossing to the road,
proceed over the crossing and stop
again to pick up the crossing
operator after he has reopened the
crossing. This method of working
will generally not be acceptable for
a regular passenger
service.
8.
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN LEVEL
CROSSINGS
TransPerth
network is mainly electrified hence
predictors arenot type approved and
level crossing is controlled with
Track circuits .There are controlled
level crossing for Road Traffic and
separate pedestrian
crossing
Roads are equipped
with half boom barriers ,warning
flashig light and audible alarm and
pedestrian crossings are equipped
with electronically controlled swing
gate .
There are active level
crossing with out half boom as well
but protected with audible alarm and
visual warning lights.All the
requirements are in compliance with
the Australian Stanadard AS
1742
8.1
Level Crossing Protected with
Flashing Light
Signals
In its
quiescent state if no train is
detected approaching or passing over
the level crossing,flashing light
warning signals will be extinguished
and audible warnings will be
silent.
If a train is detected as
approaching the level crossing
within the approach area the
flashing light warning signals will
commence and continue to flash
alternately and the audible warning
will commence and continue to
operate.
When the rear of the
train passes clear of the road area
of the level crossing, the flashing
light warning signals will become
extinguished and the audible warning
will be silenced.
8.2
Level Crossings
Controlled by Flashing Light
Signals, Half-Boom Barriers and
Audible Warning
In
its quiescent state where no train
is approaching or passing over the
level crossing, all flashing
light warning signals will be
extinguished, the half-boom barriers
will be in the fully raised position
and audible warnings will be
silent.
If a train is detected as
approaching the level crossing
within the approach area, then the
flashing light warning signals will
automatically commence and continue
to flash alternately and the audible
warnings will commence and continue
to operate.
After a predetermined
period (normally a minimum of 6
seconds) the half-boom barriers will
commence descent.After a
predetermined period (normally 10-12
seconds) the half-boom barriers will
reach the fully horizontal
position and all of the audible
warnings will be silenced unless
there is a
designated pedestrian
crossing.
After the minimum
design warning period, the front of
the approaching train will reach the
level crossing. The minimum warning
time for all new boom barrier
installations will be 25
seconds.
When the rear of
the approaching train passes clear
of the level crossing then both the
halfboom barriers willl commence to
rise and any audible warning will be
silenced.
When both half-boom
barriers reach the fully vertical
position, the flashing light warning
signals will become
extinguished.
In multiple track
level crossings, if a second train
is approaching the level crossing on
another track, as the rear of the
first train passes clear of the
level crossing, and if there is
insufficient time for the half-boom
barriers to rise and remain in the
fully raised position for
the
predetermined minimum road opening
time (normally 15 seconds) then they
remain lowered until the rear
of the second train has also passed
clear of the level
crossing.
8.3
Pedestrian and Cycleway Level
Crossings Controlled by Lights and
Audible Warnings Only
If
no train is detected as approaching
or passing over the pedestrian level
crossing then the warning lights
will be extinguished and audible
warning devices will be
silent.
If a train is detected as
approaching or passing over the
pedestrian level crossing then the
warning lights will display and
flash red warning lights and audible
warning devices will commence and
continue to sound.
When the rear
of the train passes clear of the
pedestrian level crossing then the
warning lights will become
extinguished and the audible warning
devices will be
silenced.
8.4
Pedestrian Level Crossings
Controlled by Lights and AutoLocking
Gates
If no train is
detected as approaching or passing
over the pedestrian level crossing
then the warning lights will be
extinguished, the gates will be
fully open and the audible warning
devices shall be silent.
If a
train is detected as approaching or
passing over the pedestrian level
crossing, then the warning lights
will display and flash red lights
and the audible warning devices will
commence and continue to
sound.
a. After a predetermined
period the gates commence to
close.
b. After a predetermined
period the gates will be fully
closed. One or all of the audible
warning devices may be reduced in
level.
c. After the predetermined
minimum period the front of the
approaching train will reach the
level crossing.
When the rear of
the approaching train passes clear
of the level crossing then the gates
shall commence to open, the warning
lights will become
extinguished and the audible warning
devices will be silenced.
If a
second train is approaching the
level crossing as the rear of the
first train passes clear of the
level crossing and there is
insufficient time for the gates to
open and remain in the fully open
position for a predetermined period
before commencing to close for the
second train
then they remain
closed until the rear of the second
train has also passed clear of the
level crossing.
9.
SINGAPORE LEVEL CROSSING
FOR FIRE VEHICLE/MAINTAINER
ACCESS
Singapore
SMRT operate moving block Grade of
Automation 4(GoA4) with a
designed headway of 88 seconds
maninly on elevated track or tunnled
Track with a bit of at grade track
.It is practically impossible
to maintain a normally open level
crossing .They do have test track
with design speed 80kmph and
unmanned depot operation with
operational speed of
18km/hr.Recently built Thomson East
Coast Line Depot has an at Grade
depot (Mandai Depot) with a test
track where access is given through
normally closed level crossing
.There are four types of such
crossing used for safe passage of
fire engine ,maintainer and drivers
on emergency.
9.1
Type 1 Low speed levelcrossing
with gates ,normally closed to road
traffic ( Fire Engine & Train
Delivery Road )
These
are slow speed levelcrossing with
gates ,normally closed to road
traffic.This type of crossing is
used for those level crossings that
are occasionally used by road
traffic and in depot only. They are
suitable for Train Consists
travelling up to 18 kph.The gates
are electrically detected as
closed and locked by double
pole
SIL 4 detection switches.When gates
are detected not closed and locked,
the signalling system will
safely stop Train Consists which are
routed to the level crossing and
When gates are detected not closed
and locked, the signalling
system
will safely stop
Train Consists which are routed to
the level crossing.Train Consists
are not allowed to stop on the
level crossing.
When the gates
are detected as closed and locked
after the gates are detected not
closed and locked, the signalling
system prompt the operator at
the Depot Control Centre to
confirm that train operation at the
level crossing can be resumed and
operator can remotely request train
operation at the level crossing to
resume.
When the resume train
operation request is received, the
signalling system will safely check
that the gates are detected closed
and locked before allowing train
operation at the level crossing to
resume.Indications are provided for
the depot controller as
below
(a) Gates not closed
and locked indication
(b) Gates
closed and locked indication
(c)
Prompt to confirm train operation to
resume
9.2
Type 2 Slow speed Level
Crossing with gates, normally closed
to human
traffic
This type
of crossing is used for those level
crossings that are occasionally used
by human traffic and in depot only.
They are suitable for Train Consists
travelling up to 18 kph.It is
equipped with three-position spring
loaded local
switches at each
side of the level crossing. The
three positions of the switches
are
(a) Request To Use
Crossing
(b) Normal
position
(c) Cancel Request to
Use Crossing
When the switch is
set to Request to Use Crossing to
cross, the signalling system will
safely stop Train Consists which are
routed to the level crossing. Train
Consists are not allowed stop
on the level crossing.
When
trains have been stopped from
approaching the level crossing a
safe to proceed lamp at each gate
will be lit.t has facilities
at the Depot Control Centre to
allow the operator to remotely
request train operation at the level
crossing to resume.
When the
switch is set to Cancel Request to
Use Crossing ,system will prompt the
Depot Control Operator to
resume train operations and the safe
to proceed lamps are e extinguished.
Indications at the DCC are :
(a)
Request to Use Crossing
(b)
Cancel Request to use
Crossing
(c) Prompt to confirm
train operation to
resume
9.3
Type 3 Level Crossing
with no gates, normally open to road
traffic
This type of
level crossing shall be used where
road traffic across the level
crossing is moderately frequent. Its
use are restricted to cases where
rail traffic across the level
crossing is restricted to a maximum
speed of 18 km/h.
Track circuits
as required are utilised for the
operation ,along with warning light
and audible alarms at either
side of the level crossing
.Operating Principles are as
below
(a) When a signalled
route is set across the road level
crossing, and the berth track
circuit to the signal is occupied,
the warning lights will flash
red along with audible
alarm.
(b) The railway signal of
the route that has been set across
the level crossing will not clear
until the flashing road crossing
signals have been proved illuminated
for a pre-determined time.
(c)
The failure of one lamp of each road
crossing signal shall still allow
the relevant railway signal(s) that
read over the level crossing to
clear and failure is alarmed
to the Depot Control
Centre
(d) The failure of
both lamps of one road crossing
signal will prevent clearance
of the relevant railway signals that
read overthe crossing. This failure
is alarmed to the Depot Contrl
Centre.
(e) If a route is set
across the level crossing, when the
berth track circuit to the signal is
clear, the level crossing warning
lights and audible alarm will not be
initiated and the signal will
remain at red. When the berth track
circuit to the signal
becomes
occupied, warning lights and audible
alarms are initiated as described in
(a).
(f) In case the Train
Consist passes a red railway signal
before travelling over the road
crossing, the road level crossing
warning lights and audible warning
will be initiated when any
track circuit between the
signal and level crossing
are
occupied. (Unless Train
Consist is routed away from level
crossing).
There are road warning
light indication provided to the
Depot
Controller
9.4
Type 4 Level
Crossing with gates, normally closed
to road traffic integrated
with Fire Alarm
Signal
This type
of crossing is used for those level
crossings that are occasionally used
by road traffic and in depot only.
They are suitable for Train Consists
travelling up to 90 kph, e.g. level
crossing of test track in the
depot
track in depot.This
gates are equipped with electrically
released locks ,which can be
electrically detected in closed and
locked position with double pole
detction switches .Locks are
controlled by signalling system
"Gates Locked" (RED)
and "Gates released" (Green) lamps
are provided on each side of
the gate .Depot Controller can
remotely release the switch to
unlock the gate at same time each
side of level crossing has three
position spring loaded locake
switches and the positions
are
(a) Gates release: to
request the gates to be
unlocked
(b) Normal
position
(c) Gates lock: to
request the gates to be
locked
Appropriate Fire Alarm
signal is received by the
interlocking which command to
release the lock
automatically
10.
LEVELCROSSING
PREDICTORS
These
are the relatively new trends in
level crossing .Signal engineers
releaized that if the train driver
dont maintain the allowed speed
limit and its possible train can
reach the level crossing island much
later that required also driver is
suppose not to excced his alllwed
speed limit for the train to reach
the island earlier .
Thease are
potential threats with the track
circuit based controlls.Engineers
thought of detecting the speed
of the train when it strikes the
warning point and activate the
crossing accordingly to avoid such
threats .Not forgetting the fact
that driver cannotexceed the speed
after his train strikes the
point of level crossing
activation
Hence a btetter
equipped predictors come into
existence .It used Narrow band
shunts ,wide band shunts to make it
accurate .GCP of Siemens(Former
Westinghouse) and XP4 of
Alstom (Former GE) are well know
level crossing predictors .We will
discuss level crossing tedictors in
a separate chapter with logic
,circuits and
settings.
To continue reading Register Now or Login